We start with a small, measurable pilot. Before any larger system, we check whether one concrete workflow actually gets easier — and whether the improvement is measurable.
Each step builds on the previous one. We only move towards larger systems once the smaller step has proven itself.
A short review: which AI tools are already in use, where data flows, which access rights have been granted and to what. A good fit when AI tools are already in use but nobody knows exactly where the data goes or which permissions are open.
One workflow, 1–3 integrations, a clear manually-established baseline and one metric (for example time saved). The pilot is small and ends with a decision: continue or stop.
Once the pilot has proven itself, we make it production-ready: access rights, logging, error handling, and human confirmation on external actions before anything is sent.
Monthly: agent monitoring, updates and smaller changes.
Each stage is a separate agreement. You can stop after the audit or the pilot, and that is a perfectly good result.
A short review that leaves you with a clear picture of where things stand. No agent is built yet.
One workflow, actually running and actually measured.
The same workflow, ready for daily use.
Monthly, with no new large build. An expansion is a separate agreement.
The process is short and honest: after every step it is clear whether we move forward.
20 minutes. We talk about which repeated task takes the most time.
We write down the workflow, the tools, the data, the access rights, and where your confirmation is needed.
We build only that one workflow and measure the result.
We continue with deployment or we stop. Both are fine.
A pilot usually runs for four weeks. A simple workflow goes faster; if yours is complex, I tell you before we start, not after.
In the first week we walk the workflow through step by step: who does what, which tools are involved, and where confirmation is needed. We write down the current manual baseline so there is something to compare against later. We set up access rights and the working environment.
In week two we build the agent for the chosen workflow. It reads only what we agreed on, prepares the work, and asks for confirmation before an external action. You see the result in your real tools, not in a demo.
In week three we compare the result against the baseline and fix what is not working: wording, routine, confirmation points. A few things usually surface here that nobody could foresee at the start.
In week four we write down what the agent actually did and how much time it saved. Then you decide: continue to deployment, change the workflow, or stop. If it becomes clear earlier that the workflow is not a fit, I say so immediately rather than at the end of the month.
The solution does not stay with me. You get everything you need to run it yourself and change it later.
Step by step, what the agent does, which data it uses, and what it must not do.
The configuration files and instructions the agent runs on. They are in your hands, not only on my machine.
Which rights are granted, to what, and why. The list can be trimmed at any time.
What to do when something breaks, when results are wrong, or when a job has to be restarted.
How to change the wording, the channel, or a confirmation point. It also says when to involve me.
Who to write to and in which channel. Usually a message to info@oej.ee is enough.
The pilot ends at a decision point, not on an automatic renewal. All three outcomes are honest ones.
We make the same workflow ready for daily use: logging, error handling, final access rights, and human confirmation for external actions.
If the pilot showed that the real work is somewhere else, we review it and run a new small pilot. That is a good outcome too.
If there is no real gain, I say so directly and the work ends. No further obligations remain.
Once the solution is part of daily work, monthly support can sit alongside it: monitoring, updates, and smaller changes. It is optional and can be ended at any time.
Good work starts with clear boundaries. These are things I do not offer.
The price is not one number, and it is not a count of hours. It comes from the size and the risk of the work.
Every system the agent has to talk to adds setup and testing. One tool is simple; five is a small project.
If the process lives in someone's head or is spread across several files, writing it down takes longer than the build. A clear process moves faster.
The more sensitive the data, the more carefully access rights and data paths have to be designed. That is time worth spending.
Every point where a person approves something has to be configured and tested. Some workflows need one approval, some need four.
If most cases look alike, the agent is easier to build. If every case is different, more time goes into working through the exceptions.
If you want to adjust wording and routine yourself later, we invest more in instructions and documentation. If changes stay with me, the handover is shorter.
Ask for a quote. Every workflow is different, so I give a quote after we have reviewed the workflow together.
Register your interestShort, honest answers. If something is missing, write and ask.
Usually four weeks: mapping, a first working version, measurement, and the decision. A simple workflow moves faster; if yours is complex, I say so before we start.
There is no single price, because every workflow is different. I send a quote once we have reviewed the workflow and I know what the work actually involves.
The goal is to keep your data under your control and inside the EU where possible. We review the exact setup for your workflow. If we use an external model service, I say plainly that requests may leave the EU — I will not hide that.
The agent does not make external changes without a person confirming them. A wrong result shows up before anything goes out. The log shows what the agent did, when, and based on which information.
Yes. At handover you get the agent configuration, the workflow description, and written instructions for making changes. Small changes you can make yourself; for larger ones you get in touch.
No. The pilot ends with a decision, and stopping is a perfectly good outcome. No further obligations remain.
Tell us about one workflow that takes too much time. Or write directly: info@oej.ee.